Parsing Steve Jobs' Numbers: 450,000 iPads Sold, 600,000 iBooks Downloads, But What's Really Going On?

By Stephen Windwalker, Editor of Kindle Nation


There are some interesting numbers floating around about the iPad and its iBooks Store, and some of them seem to merit a closer look.

First, congratulations to Apple and Steve Jobs for an impressive rollout of a pretty cool device, and for being reasonably straightforward with the public in sharing some numbers. Given how close Amazon plays such numbers to the vest, covering the Kindle is a bit like navigating through heavy fog by comparison.

Jobs appeared at an iPhone event on Apple's Cupertino campus today and led off with a bit of an iPad progress report, as reported in a New York Times blog and elsewhere.

Jobs said that there were 300,000 iPads sold "on the first day," and that the cumulative total as of today's even was 450,000. This is impressive, but it makes me wonder:
  • It was widely reported that there were at least 125,000 iPad pre-orders on the weekend of March 12-14, the first weekend when pre-orders were taken. So, if those 125,000 were counted in the 300,000 first-day total, as one would expect, does that mean that the total number ordered and sold fresh on Saturday, between all Apple Stores and other retailers like Best Buy, was only 175,000?
  • How many pre-orders were recorded from March 15 to the beginning of April and included in the 300,000 April 3 sales? If those totalled 5,000 a day, could that mean there were only 125,000 fresh sales on April 3?
Don't get me wrong: 450,000 iPads sold to date at the various iPad price points means over $250 million at retail, which, as I said, is impressive. The online Apple Store shows a slight shipping delay right now, and Jobs said today that "we're not making enough right now" and that he "heard Best Buy was sold out." And Apple has yet to reveal anything about the number of iPad 3G pre-orders fir late April shipment, which could conceivably double the volume of wifi iPad orders.

At the same time, when we become so accustomed to expecting magical things from Apple (and it's been Apple's choice to use the word a fair amount lately), something like the actual sales figures can seem a little underwhelming. 

After waiting over the course of the last year or two for the launch of the iTablet or the iSlate or the iPad, one naturally expected there to be some pent-up demand, and there was. But that iPad Fever seems to have been roughly equivalent to the pent-up demand that led Amazon, on its February 23, 2009 release date for the Kindle 2, to ship roughly a quarter of a million units after several months of waiting. 

250,000 units in a day, 300,000 units in a day, those are great days for a new product. But Apple has shipped 50 million iPhones and another 35 million iPod Touches, so one is almost inclined to say "ho-hum" at launch-day sales in the low six figures.

There were other numbers from Steve Jobs today, specifically about ebook sales. 

He said that there had been 250,000 ebook downloads from the iBooks Store within the first 24 hours, and 600,000 ebook downloads in all so far (which means about 90,000 per day after the first 24 hours). He didn't say how many iPad owners had downloaded the free iBooks app, so it's impossible to suss out the relative numbers of iBooks visitors and Kindle for iPad visitors, or how many books the average visitor is buying and downloading. 

250,000 downloads in a day seems impressive, doesn't it? But for those publishing industry observers who see salvation when they see Steve Jobs, it may be worth noting by comparison that as early as October 2008, when the Kindle's installed base was not much larger than the iPad's installed base is today, there were a handful of Kindle Store authors who were experiencing daily Kindle Store sales of over a thousand copies per individual title. Cumulatively, over the 28-month life of the Kindle, it is very likely there have been over 300 million ebooks downloaded from the Kindle Store. This estimate, of course, includes Kindle books downloaded to a growing range of Kindle-compatible devices that now includes the iPad.

One interesting if minor disconnect, at present, is in the two listings of bestselling "free apps" for books that one finds in the two iterations of Apple's App Store that appear, respectively, on the iPad itself and in the iTunes Store's App department that comes up on a computer:
  • In the iPad's rendering of the App Store, the iBooks app is listed as the #1 top free iPad app. There's not another "books" listing in the top 20, but a public domain app called Free Books is #21, a great Marvel Comics app is #22, and the Kindle for iPad app is #24 as of 8 p.m. EDT April 8.
  • Meanwhile, if you look at the Top Free Apps under "books" in the iTunes Store's App department as it comes up on a computer, the Kindle app is #1 and the iBooks app is nowhere to be found. 
Some of this disparity would seem to be about the fact that the Kindle app is also an iPhone app, and the underlying fact that there are nearly 200 times as many iPhones and iPod Touches that can run it as the number of iPads that can run the iBooks app. But it does seem as if there may be some effort on Apple's part -- perhaps inadvertent? maybe they forgot there was something called the Kindle? -- to tilt the playing field when one initiates a search for iPad-compatible books apps in the iTunes Store's App department and finds dozens of apps listed, but no Kindle for iPad app:

Naturally, with a catalog that is less than 10 percent of the Kindle Store's catalog after adjusting each store's list to omit free public domain titles, it will take the iBooks Store a while to compete seriously with the Kindle catalog regardless of the liberties that may be taken with home field advantage. But it does seem clear that, with each iPad sold, the future looks brighter and brighter for both Apple and Amazon.

4 comments:

AndrewX said...

I'm not sure about the integrity of this piece; what puzzles me in particular is this paragraph:

"..250,000 downloads seems impressive. BUT...". So, from the "but", I assume you're going to tell me something that makes it unimpressive. What does that turn out to be, but two almost completely unrelated statistics, one, the fact that a "handful" (shall we say 10?) of Kindle authors sold "over 1000" (shall we say 1100?) copies per day when the installed base was a similar size. Er, so what? That's 11000 copies for that handful, just another 239,000 to go. The 2nd stat. attempting to unimpress me is that Kindles is averaging 370,000 (300 millions/840 days) downloads a day over 2.33 years. You don't think the installed base might have grown over that period? Hey, my orange is juicier than your Apple!

So these comparisons are, at best, ingenuous. Is there really any point reading the rest of the piece?

Anonymous said...

On iTunes on a computer, Top Free iPad Apps under Books: 1. iBooks; 3. Kindle

On iTunes on a computer, Top Free iPad Apps overall: 1. iBooks; 24. Kindle

So if there was any glitch, it's been fixed.

Anonymous said...

Thank you AndrewX, I agree with you. It was really frustrating reading this article and many others where writers use comparisons that are non sequitur. The best one was:

"250,000 units in a day, 300,000 units in a day...But Apple has shipped 50 million iPhones and another 35 million iPod Touches, so one is almost inclined to say "ho-hum" at launch-day sales in the low six figures."

So this writer wants to compare a single day statistic to a 3 year statistic? Although still not valid but it would have been more accurate to take the one day stat and multiply it by 3 years which would mean that Apple would sell about 328.5 million iPads in 3 years. I wonder if that's impressive enough for the author.

So Stephen, let's be fair, the iPad is a very nice product with a great sales start but there's no need to try to downplay its popularity. Although the Kindle is a great device for reading the iPad will simple overshadow it, regardless of the fact that its not designed for extended reading.

Laura Gibbs said...

My main reason in purchasing an iPad was because I needed an ebook reader that would make it easy for me to read the 15th-, 16th-, 17th- and 18th-century books available in PDF format from GoogleBooks, Internet Archive, Early English Books Online and the University of Munich's amazing Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek project. The GoodReader application for the iPad is a fantastic PDF reader that allows you to read extremely large PDF files in a very convenient way (GoodReader did not work well on the iPhone but their iPad version of the app is marvelous), with excellent file transfer and file management features.

I know people are more interested in epub formatted books and other commerical ebook formats, but for someone like me (academic researcher) who is more interested in reading PDF-formatted books made available from library digitization projects, the iPad is a godsend. I ordered it with moderate expectations (since the iPhone/Touch was a terrible PDF reader), and I am actually OVERJOYED with the iPad and the GoodReader app. It is exactly what I need for reading my huge library of PDF digital books.

I'm not sure what the other commenter meant about the iPad not being designed for extended reading. That is exactly what I am using it for, and the ability to resize the page display to any enlargement is really crucial for the odd book sizes and typography found in early printed books. Admittedly, these are not the typical books that people want to read - but the iPad is perfect for reading these early printed books in a way that the Kindle simply was not. I now have stored on my iPad a library of several hundred Renaissance and Baroque books that, just 10 years ago, I would have had to travel to Europe to look at - now I can read them on my back porch while enjoying a margarita. These are good times to be studying Renaissance literature! :-)